netdev - copy_skb_header() and sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXs5wVp2bLnwFiuYEg6ZOv0t3DX4PCCgY-EURbs5bySgEqtdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:55:32 +0300
From:	Kevin Wilson <wkevils@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: copy_skb_header() and sk_buff flags (question)

Hello,

I have a question if I may, as I cannot understand this point:

I try to understand why in __copy_skb_header() we copy various flags
(like ip_summed,
local_df, pkt_type, priority, ipvs_property, and more. But there are
flags which we do
not copy, like nohdr, or fclone, or peeked.

 Aren't these flags part of the sk_buff header?

regards,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html