netdev - Re: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and locations.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120824.111238.1400056420671100883.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:12:38 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	richardcochran@...il.com, matthew.vick@...el.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and
 locations.

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:22:34 -0700

> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 08:32 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:02:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> 
>> > Improving code clarity and consistency isn't churn.
>> 
>> This patch series moves code around for no good reason. That is, by
>> definition, churn.
> 
> For your definition of good.

I think the people doing all of the actual development and
maintainence of the code get to decide how to define good.  And in
this case that's basically the Intel NIC development team, not you.

Moving functions around is a very valuable and useful cleanup quite
often.

So you can count me in on their definition of "good" as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html