[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mdaatbj.ca5ac4e44d852a03ede087a5ed658cd9@obelix.schillstrom.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@...illstrom.com>
To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
"Julian Anastasov" <ja@....bg>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>,
"Wensong Zhang" <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH 2/3] ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header
handling in IPVS
>
>On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>> Based on patch from: Hans Schillstrom
>>
>> IPv6 headers must be processed in order of appearance,
>> neither can it be assumed that Upper layer headers is first.
>> If anything else than L4 is the first header IPVS will throw it.
>>
>> IPVS will write SNAT & DNAT modifications at a fixed pos which
>> will corrupt the message. Proper header position must be found
>> before writing modifying packet.
>>
>> This patch contains a lot of API changes. This is done, to avoid
>> the costly scan of finding the IPv6 headers, via ipv6_find_hdr().
>> Finding the IPv6 headers is done as early as possible, and passed
>> on as a pointer "struct ip_vs_iphdr *" to the affected functions.
>
>How about we change netfilter to set up the skb's transport header
>at an early time so we can avoid all (most of) these header scans
>in netfilter?
I think that would be great, maybe it should be global i.e. not only a netfilter issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists