netdev - Re: Gianfar ethernet drop package

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1346065738.2420.135.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2012 04:08:58 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Aníbal Almeida Pinto <anibal.pinto@...cec.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Gianfar ethernet drop package

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 11:32 +0100, Aníbal Almeida Pinto wrote:

> I generate the log on the board with tcpdump -i eth0 -w log_eth0.txt and 
> loaded the result on wireshark (on other pc).
> 
> On the wireshark everything appears to be fine don't have nothing that 
> indicate the protocol isn't supported.
> 
> On /etc/protocols is a list with protocols, it there is a place where 
> exist a place with protocols supported by kernel ?

So all frames understood by wireshark are also automatically handled by
your linux machine ? That sounds cool, so we no longer have to add stuff
in the kernel ?

Let me explain again :

For example, if you dont have IPv6 loaded, IPv6 frames wont be handled,
and they appear to be dropped. They really are.

If you run tcpdump/wireshark, these frames are at least delivered once
to a sniffer, so they are not "dropped", even if no protocol handler
actually reacts to them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html