[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <503F3589.5070804@pace.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:42:33 +0200
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@...e.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Move in6_dev_hold under CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY
Hello,
I am currently looking at a problem with in6 interface refcnt on a
really old kernel and I have just noticed something I find suspicious in
all kernels until now.
The comment at net/ipv6/addrconf.c:396 suggests that the call to
in6_dev_hold is only for ipv6_regen_rndid.
As a consequence, if CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY is not set, then this
in6_dev_hold will leak a refcnt.
Can someone look at this ?
I did not test this patch, yet it looks reasonable to me.
Thank you.
$ git diff
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 6bc85f7..263fcf3 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -393,11 +393,6 @@ static struct inet6_dev *ipv6_add_dev(struct
net_device *dev)
return NULL;
}
- /* One reference from device. We must do this before
- * we invoke __ipv6_regen_rndid().
- */
- in6_dev_hold(ndev);
-
if (dev->flags & (IFF_NOARP | IFF_LOOPBACK))
ndev->cnf.accept_dad = -1;
@@ -410,6 +405,12 @@ static struct inet6_dev *ipv6_add_dev(struct
net_device *dev)
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ndev->tempaddr_list);
+
+ /* One reference from device. We must do this before
+ * we invoke ipv6_regen_rndid().
+ */
+ in6_dev_hold(ndev);
+
setup_timer(&ndev->regen_timer, ipv6_regen_rndid, (unsigned
long)ndev);
if ((dev->flags&IFF_LOOPBACK) ||
dev->type == ARPHRD_TUNNEL ||
--
David Marchand
This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl. - www.blackspider.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists