[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347028510.2484.736.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:35:10 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: vyasevich@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, sri@...ibm.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 17:57 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> When a xfrm policy is inserted or deleted, we must invalidate
> all dst and recalculate the route.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> ---
> include/net/dst.h | 7 +++++++
> net/core/dst.c | 1 +
> net/core/sock.c | 4 ++--
> net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 3 +--
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
> index 9a78810..478e55a 100644
> --- a/include/net/dst.h
> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct dst_entry {
> atomic_t __refcnt; /* client references */
> int __use;
> unsigned long lastuse;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> + u32 flow_cache_genid;
> +#endif
> union {
> struct dst_entry *next;
> struct rtable __rcu *rt_next;
> @@ -457,6 +460,10 @@ static inline int dst_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> static inline struct dst_entry *dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> + if (dst->flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))
> + return NULL;
> +#endif
Hmm... cant we reuse rt_genid ?
(When changing flow_cache_genid, change &net->ipv4.rt_genid)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists