netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <504A08EA.3080506@6wind.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:47:06 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	vyasevich@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, sri@...ibm.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()

Le 07/09/2012 16:35, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 17:57 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> When a xfrm policy is inserted or deleted, we must invalidate
>> all dst and recalculate the route.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>> ---
>>   include/net/dst.h     | 7 +++++++
>>   net/core/dst.c        | 1 +
>>   net/core/sock.c       | 4 ++--
>>   net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 3 +--
>>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
>> index 9a78810..478e55a 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dst.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct dst_entry {
>>   	atomic_t		__refcnt;	/* client references	*/
>>   	int			__use;
>>   	unsigned long		lastuse;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> +	u32			flow_cache_genid;
>> +#endif
>>   	union {
>>   		struct dst_entry	*next;
>>   		struct rtable __rcu	*rt_next;
>> @@ -457,6 +460,10 @@ static inline int dst_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>>   static inline struct dst_entry *dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
>>   {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> +	if (dst->flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +#endif
>
> Hmm... cant we reuse rt_genid ?
>
> (When changing flow_cache_genid, change &net->ipv4.rt_genid)

And so adding a new field in net->ipv6?


Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html