[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120908.184327.1052019215545004538.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: chema@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chema@...keley.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: small bug on rxhash calculation
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 10:18:40 +0200
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:40 -0700, Chema Gonzalez wrote:
>> In the current rxhash calculation function, while the
>> sorting of the ports/addrs is coherent (you get the
>> same rxhash for packets sharing the same 4-tuple, in
>> both directions), ports and addrs are sorted
>> independently. This implies packets from a connection
>> between the same addresses but crossed ports hash to
>> the same rxhash.
>>
>> For example, traffic between A=S:l and B=L:s is hashed
>> (in both directions) from {L, S, {s, l}}. The same
>> rxhash is obtained for packets between C=S:s and D=L:l.
>>
>> This patch ensures that you either swap both addrs and ports,
>> or you swap none. Traffic between A and B, and traffic
>> between C and D, get their rxhash from different sources
>> ({L, S, {l, s}} for A<->B, and {L, S, {s, l}} for C<->D)
>>
>> The patch is co-written with Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>
>> ---
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists