netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: small bug on rxhash calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 08 Sep 2012 10:18:40 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chema Gonzalez <chema@...keley.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: small bug on rxhash calculation

On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:40 -0700, Chema Gonzalez wrote:
> In the current rxhash calculation function, while the
> sorting of the ports/addrs is coherent (you get the
> same rxhash for packets sharing the same 4-tuple, in
> both directions), ports and addrs are sorted
> independently. This implies packets from a connection
> between the same addresses but crossed ports hash to
> the same rxhash.
> 
> For example, traffic between A=S:l and B=L:s is hashed
> (in both directions) from {L, S, {s, l}}. The same
> rxhash is obtained for packets between C=S:s and D=L:l.
> 
> This patch ensures that you either swap both addrs and ports,
> or you swap none. Traffic between A and B, and traffic
> between C and D, get their rxhash from different sources
> ({L, S, {l, s}} for A<->B, and {L, S, {s, l}} for C<->D)
> 
> The patch is co-written with Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>
> ---

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html