netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120910.131829.193126565067890591.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vyasevich@...il.com
Cc:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, sri@...ibm.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst
 entries

From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:35:03 -0400

> I am not sure this is right...  This has a side-effect that when an
> rt_cache_flush() is called, it invalidates IPv6 routes a well....
> 
> Its all fine and good do this when a new policy is added, but not when
> IPv4 routing table changes.

I disagree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html