[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504DFF90.3010802@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:56:16 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, sri@...ibm.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion
Le 10/09/2012 16:21, Vlad Yasevich a écrit :
> On 09/10/2012 09:22 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> When a policy is inserted or deleted, all dst should be recalculated.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>> ---
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
>> index 741a32a..67f456d 100644
>> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
>> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
>> @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy
>> *policy, int excl)
>> xfrm_pol_hold(policy);
>> net->xfrm.policy_count[dir]++;
>> atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
>> + rt_genid_bump(net);
>> if (delpol)
>> __xfrm_policy_unlink(delpol, dir);
>> policy->index = delpol ? delpol->index : xfrm_gen_index(net, dir);
>>
>
> What about security_load_policy() and security_set_bools(). They also bumps the
> flow_cache_genid by way of selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload().
Right. I'm not familiar with this part, but it seems you're right, rt_genid
should be bumped too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists