[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120920.184507.1693343817853439763.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:45:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sony.chacko@...gic.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dept_NX_Linux_NIC_Driver@...gic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/19] qlcnic: 83xx hardware access and data path
routines
From: Sony Chacko <sony.chacko@...gic.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:46:07 -0400
> + for (i = QLCNIC_DEV_INFO_SIZE + 1;
> + j < ARRAY_SIZE(qlcnic_83xx_reg_tbl); i++, j++)
The 'j' on the second line should be at the first column after the
openning parenthesis on the first line.
> + ahw->intr_tbl = vmalloc(num_msix *
> + sizeof(struct qlcnic_intrpt_config));
Same problem here.
> + if (!(adapter->flags & QLCNIC_MSI_ENABLED) &&
> + !(adapter->flags & QLCNIC_MSIX_ENABLED)) {
And here.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_info(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> + "Error getting Rx stats\n");
This dev_info() call is indented one TAB too deeply.
> + npar_info->max_mtu = le16_to_cpu(nic_info->max_mtu);
> +
> +}
Please remove this extraneous empty line.
> + if (!((ADDR_IN_RANGE(addr, QLCNIC_ADDR_QDR_NET,
> + QLCNIC_ADDR_QDR_NET_MAX)) ||
> + (ADDR_IN_RANGE(addr, QLCNIC_ADDR_DDR_NET,
> + QLCNIC_ADDR_DDR_NET_MAX)))){
This is improperly indented, function arguments split up into
subsequent lines should line up with the first column after
the openning parenthesis that they are a part of.
On the last line, there needs to be a space between the closing
parenthesis and the openning curly brace.
> + } else if ((mbx_err_code == QLCNIC_MBX_RSP_OK)
> + || (mbx_err_code == QLCNIC_MBX_PORT_RSP_OK)) {
Incorrect indentation, and the "||" should appear at the end of the
first line rather than at the beginning of the second line.
> + mbx->req.arg[0] = (type | (mbx->req.num << 16) |
> + (adapter->ahw->fw_hal_version << 29));
This second line needs to be indented properly. If it makes the line too
long then split the expression up using temporary variables or create
a helper function so you can put the expression at a less deep indentation
level.
> + cmd.req.arg[1] = cpu_to_le32((mode ? 1 : 0) |
> + (adapter->recv_ctx->context_id) << 16);
This is not properly indented (and it's extremely tiring explaining
this same thing more than a dozen times during this review)
The first "(" on the second line must line up with the first column
after the openning parenthesis of cpu_to_le32( on the previous
line.
> + cmd.req.arg[1] = cpu_to_le32(1 |
> + adapter->recv_ctx->context_id << 16);
Same problem.
> + cmd.req.arg[1] = cpu_to_le32(2 |
> + adapter->recv_ctx->context_id << 16);
Same problem.
> + cmd.req.arg[1] = cpu_to_le32((mode ? (BIT_0 | BIT_1 | BIT_3) : 0) |
> + ((adapter->recv_ctx->context_id) << 16));
By some strange miracle you are able to get it correct in this case.
> + cmd.req.arg[1] = cpu_to_le32(op | (1 << 8) |
> + (adapter->recv_ctx->context_id << 16));
Again, same problem.
> + cmd.req.arg[2] = cpu_to_le32(coal->rx_packets |
> + (coal->rx_time_us << 16));
And here too.
> + cmd.req.arg[1] = cpu_to_le32(op | BIT_31 |
> + (func_id << 16));
And again.
> + for (i = 0, index = 2; i < max_ints; i++, index += 2) {
> +
> + val = le32_to_cpu(cmd.rsp.arg[index]);
Please remove this unnecessary blank line.
> + }
> +
> +
> + th->psh = push;
There is no need for two blank lines here, remove at least one of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists