[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348247465.2669.766.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:11:05 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@...com, subramanian.vijay@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] tcp: use order-3 pages in tcp_sendmsg()
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 13:04 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> It's a silly limitation, in net/core/dev.c:
>
> /* Turn on no cache copy if HW is doing checksum */
> if (!(dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)) {
> dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> if (dev->features & NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM) {
> dev->wanted_features |= NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> dev->features |= NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> }
> }
>
> Maybe this is probably better done as:
>
> /* Turn on no cache copy if HW is doing checksum */
> dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> if (!(dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)) {
> if (dev->features & NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM) {
> dev->wanted_features |= NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> dev->features |= NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> }
> }
>
> And then the code matches more closely the comment. :-)
I did a test, and for various combinations (producer/consumer on same
core or not, same cpu or not...) and performance is divided by 2
So I guess we can leave the code as is
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists