[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120921.131652.353726055575103840.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gaofeng@...fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: release referenct of ip6_null_entry's dst entry
in __ip6_del_rt
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:25:34 +0800
> as we hold dst_entry before we call __ip6_del_rt,
> so we should alse call dst_release not only return
> -ENOENT when the rt6_info is ip6_null_entry.
>
> and we already hold the dst entry, so I think it's
> safe to call dst_release out of the write-read lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
I cannot find a code path where we can actually end up
with an ip6_null_entry here and I'd much rather declare
this condition as a bug.
Patrick McHardy added this check back in 2006:
commit 6c813a7297e3af4cd7c3458e09e9ee3d161c6830
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Date: Sun Aug 6 22:22:47 2006 -0700
[IPV6]: Fix crash in ip6_del_rt
But the ipv6 code has changed substantially since then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists