[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKh2mn5shRWNXzj0BotxqfM2EJUM9UBQfUsXVqdd63eiWo0S-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:04:51 +0100
From: Steve Glendinning <steve@...well.net>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] smsc95xx: enable power saving mode during system suspend
On 26 September 2012 17:17, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:
> Yes, but you are a lot less likely to know about it if you BUG out. The
> user will be left with no other choice than hitting reset or poweroff.
> What's the point of that?
>
> If your driver crashes but the machine is left running, then the user
> may forward the Oops to you. That's much more useful.
Good point, I hadn't considered that.
So for user reportability am I better off to use WARN_ON in this case,
or simply remove the check and let the null pointer dereference
happen?
-Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists