[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350717994.13333.298.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:26:34 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: Vimalkumar <j.vimal@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] htb: improved accuracy at high rates
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:52 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> Did it really take 20 concurrent netperf UDP_STREAM tests to get to
> those rates? And why UDP_STREAM rather than TCP_STREAM?
>
> I couldn't recall if GSO did anything for UDP, so did some quick and
> dirty tests flipping GSO on and off on a 3.2.0 kernel, and the service
> demands didn't seem to change. So, with 8000 bytes of user payload did
> HTB actually see 8000ish byte packets, or did it actually see a series
> of <= MTU sized IP datagram fragmentsOn 10/19/2012 03:26 PM, Vimalkumar wrote:
UFO is quite a virtual feature for the moment ;)
To my knowledge only one driver uses it (neterion/s2io.c)
So most probably HTB sees the fragments built by the stack before
queueing packets to the qdisc layer.
tcpdump can be used to check this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists