[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350719242.13333.339.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:47:22 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vimalkumar <j.vimal@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] htb: improved accuracy at high rates
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 15:26 -0700, Vimalkumar wrote:
> Current HTB (and TBF) uses rate table computed by
> the "tc" userspace program, which has the following
> issue:
>
> The rate table has 256 entries to map packet lengths
> to token (time units). With TSO sized packets, the
> 256 entry granularity leads to loss/gain of rate,
> making the token bucket inaccurate.
>
> Thus, instead of relying on rate table, this patch
> explicitly computes the time and accounts for packet
> transmission times with nanosec granularity.
>
> This greatly improves accuracy of HTB with a wide
> range of packet sizes.
>
> Example:
>
> tc qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: \
> htb default 1
>
> tc class add dev $dev classid 1:1 parent 1: \
> rate 1Gbit mtu 64k
>
> Ideally it should work with all intermediate sized
> packets as well, but...
>
> Test:
> for i in {1..20}; do
> (netperf -H $host -t UDP_STREAM -l 30 -- -m $size &);
> done
>
> With size=400 bytes: achieved rate ~600Mb/s
> With size=1000 bytes: achieved rate ~835Mb/s
> With size=8000 bytes: achieved rate ~1012Mb/s
>
> With new HTB, in all cases, we achieve ~1000Mb/s.
> Many thanks to Eric Dumazet for review and feedback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vimalkumar <j.vimal@...il.com>
> ---
Thanks Vimal for this promising work.
I am going to test it, but my preliminary remarks are :
1) This is a net-next work, so its better to add the net-next tag in
the title, as in :
"[PATCH net-next] htb: improved accuracy at high rates"
So next submission will also include a version tag as in :
"[PATCH net-next V2] htb: improved accuracy at high rates"
2) I dont know how you generated your diff, but its not applicable
without knowing where file is located.
So instead of
diff --git a/sch_htb.c b/sch_htb.c
index 29b942c..a808ba1 100644
--- a/sch_htb.c
+++ b/sch_htb.c
we need the proper :
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
index 9d75b77..13e02b3 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
3) Always use an up2date net-next tree before submitting an official
patch.
Here is what I have applying your patch (once I fixed the path)
patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
Hunk #9 succeeded at 612 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 654 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 704 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 715 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 902 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 915 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 934 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1121 (offset -1 lines).
It means you worked on an old version, so its always suspicious
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists