[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350720070.13333.359.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:01:10 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/13] ixgbe: Add support for IPv6 and UDP to
ixgbe_get_headlen
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 23:25 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>
> This change adds support for IPv6 and UDP to ixgbe_get_headlen. The
> advantage to this is that we can now handle ipv4/UDP, ipv6/TCP, and
> ipv6/UDP with a single memcpy instead of having to do them in multiple
> pskb_may_pull calls.
>
> A quick bit of testing shows that we increase throughput for a single
> session of netperf from 8800Mpbs to about 9300Mpbs in the case of ipv6/TCP.
> As such overall ipv6 performance should improve with this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Stephen Ko <stephen.s.ko@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thats pretty interesting.
Why this work is not done generically, so that all drivers can have
benefit of it ?
Even a driver not using fragments could have benefit, because we could
prefetch() so that GRO stack is faster (no stall to get the last 2 bytes
of a TCP header when timestamps are used)
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists