netdev - Re: [net-next 08/12] ixgbe: using is_zero_ether

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1350967518.7502.32.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:45:18 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 08/12] ixgbe: using is_zero_ether_addr() to simplify
 the code

On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 21:26 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
> Using is_zero_ether_addr() to simplify the code.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c
[]
> @@ -1778,8 +1778,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_validate_mac_addr(u8 *mac_addr)
[]
> -	else if (mac_addr[0] == 0 && mac_addr[1] == 0 && mac_addr[2] == 0 &&
> -	         mac_addr[3] == 0 && mac_addr[4] == 0 && mac_addr[5] == 0)
> +	else if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))

This means the more comprehensive simplifying patch
I submitted doesn't apply.  Easy to fix up though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html