[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350969467.2135.11.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:17:47 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 08/12] ixgbe: using is_zero_ether_addr() to simplify
the code
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 21:45 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 21:26 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
> > Using is_zero_ether_addr() to simplify the code.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c
> []
> > @@ -1778,8 +1778,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_validate_mac_addr(u8 *mac_addr)
> []
> > - else if (mac_addr[0] == 0 && mac_addr[1] == 0 && mac_addr[2] == 0 &&
> > - mac_addr[3] == 0 && mac_addr[4] == 0 && mac_addr[5] == 0)
> > + else if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
>
> This means the more comprehensive simplifying patch
> I submitted doesn't apply. Easy to fix up though.
>
Yeah, I have taken care of fix up to your patch in my queue. Want me to
send you the fixed up patch so that you can confirm my fixes?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists