[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6AE080B68D46FC4BA2D2769E68D765B70810B134@039-SN2MPN1-023.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:59:38 +0000
From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@...escale.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@...driver.com>,
Manoil Claudiu-B08782 <B08782@...escale.com>,
Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar_ptp: use iomem, not ioports resource tree in
probe
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> From: Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@...driver.com>
>
> When using a 36 bit dtb file, the driver complains "resource busy".
>
> Investigating the source of the message leads one to the
> gianfar_ptp_probe function.
>
> Since the type of the device resource requested in this function
> is IORESOURCE_MEM, it should use "iomem_resource" instead of
> "ioports_resource".
I can't comment on this patch, since I didn't write the driver, but I
am confused on one thing. Why is the driver using platform_xxx calls
to get data? Why isn't it using of_xxx calls to read properties from
the device tree? For example, why is it using
etsects->irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
to get the IRQ? Shouldn't it do this instead:
etsects->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists