[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7070@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:03:54 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 2/5] rtnl/ipv6: use netconf msg to advertise forwarding status
> > +static inline int inet6_netconf_msgsize_devconf(int type)
>
> Outside of header files, we don't add explicit inlines, we let
> the compiler decide.
Hmmm.... In my experience it makes bad decisions,
even for static functions that are only called once.
And yes, I have checked that the inlined code is smaller
and faster.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists