netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] packet: tx_ring: allow the user to choose tx data offset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:14:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Paul.Chavent@...ra.fr
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] packet: tx_ring: allow the user to choose
 tx data offset

From: Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@...ra.fr>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:56:54 +0200

> +		if (unlikely((off < off_min) || (off_max < off))) {
> +			pr_err("payload offset (%d) out of range [%d;%d]\n",
> +				off, off_min, off_max);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

Users should not be able to spam the kernel log with error messages
by simply make setsockopt() calls.

This error log is inappropriate.
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct packet_sock {
>  	unsigned int		tp_reserve;
>  	unsigned int		tp_loss:1;
>  	unsigned int		tp_tstamp;
> +	unsigned int		tp_tx_has_off:1;
>  	struct packet_type	prot_hook ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>  };

Please put the new bit field next to other existing bit fields so that
there is less wasted space in the struct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html