[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50923A48.1080906@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:00:56 +0800
From: Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] net: xfrm: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper
Herbert Xu said, at 2012/11/1 11:41:
> Please refer to the comment in the patch above.
>
> But I think the patch is wrong anyway because it would introduce
> a warning, no?
yes, __this_cpu_ptr(or __this_cpu_read) is more reasonable
which don't check preemption context.
>
> Thanks,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists