[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121113.142005.106273728495001348.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:20:05 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc: gregory.v.rose@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 04/11] ixgbevf: Add flag to indicate when rx is in
net poll
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:03:18 -0800
> From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
>
> napi_gro_receive shouldn't be called from netpoll context. Doing
> so was causing kernel panics when jumbo frames larger than 2K were set.
> Add a flag to check if the Rx ring processing is occurring from interrupt
> context or from netpoll context and call netif_rx() if in the polling
> context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Sibai Li <sibai.li@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
This is not a scalable solution.
It is not prudent to have every single driver do a check like
this. If using GRO receive from netpoll causes problems,
then it's a generic issue rather than a driver specific one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists