[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121113112509.000074b5@unknown>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:25:09 -0800
From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<gospo@...hat.com>, <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 04/11] ixgbevf: Add flag to indicate when rx is in
net poll
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:20:05 -0500
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:03:18 -0800
>
> > From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> >
> > napi_gro_receive shouldn't be called from netpoll context. Doing
> > so was causing kernel panics when jumbo frames larger than 2K were
> > set. Add a flag to check if the Rx ring processing is occurring
> > from interrupt context or from netpoll context and call netif_rx()
> > if in the polling context.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> > Tested-by: Sibai Li <sibai.li@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>
> This is not a scalable solution.
>
> It is not prudent to have every single driver do a check like
> this. If using GRO receive from netpoll causes problems,
> then it's a generic issue rather than a driver specific one.
OK, let me look into this a bit more then.
Thanks,
- Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists