netdev - Re: [GIT PULL] Marvell mvneta Ethernet/MDIO drivers checkpatch fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121119.141653.1660827388689535803.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:16:53 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com
Cc:	jason@...edaemon.net, andrew@...n.ch,
	gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alior@...vell.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Marvell mvneta Ethernet/MDIO drivers checkpatch
 fixes

From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:00:31 +0100

> Sebastian Hesselbarth noticed that the new mvmdio and mvneta drivers
> produce a number of checkpatch warnings, related to the incluse of
> <asm/delay.h> and to the style of multiline comments. The following
> three patches fix those checkpatch warnings. Feel free to integrate
> them either as follow-up patches of the network driver patches, or to
> squash them into the driver patches as you prefer.
> 
> David, are you OK with those patches and the fact that we carry them
> through the arm-soc tree, as we agreed to do for the mvmdio and mvneta
> drivers? Those patches are really simple/stupid fixes.

No problem, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html