[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121127123957.GT6186@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:39:57 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Steve Glendinning <steve@...well.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: smsc95xx: detect chip revision specific features
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:32:26PM +0000, Steve Glendinning wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> > drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
> > 1283 if (pdata->wolopts & (WAKE_BCAST | WAKE_MCAST | WAKE_ARP | WAKE_UCAST)) {
> > 1284 u32 *filter_mask = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
> > ^^
> > We allocate 8 unsigned 32 bit values. I think this is the mistake here
> > actually. It is a typo and should say:
> >
> > u32 *filter_mask = kzalloc(sizeof(u32) * 32, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > If 8 elements was the intent then that's nasty.
>
> Good spot! 8 32-bit elements was the intent, but all the following
> code is actually accessing it using what should be byte offsets. So I
> think this should read:
>
> u8 *filter_mask = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> The rest of the code following makes sense then, up until:
>
> > 1349 ret = smsc95xx_write_reg_nopm(dev, WUFF, filter_mask[i]);
>
> Which we'll need to change so it dereferences a u32 at that offset
> instead of a u8, something like *((u32 *)&filter_mask[i])
>
> If this looks good to you I'll prepare a patch?
>
Sound fine to me. Could you give me the Reported-by: tag?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists