netdev - Re: TCP and reordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50B656CC.1040001@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:24:12 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Saku Ytti <saku@...i.fi>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP and reordering

On 11/28/2012 12:54 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-11-28 00:35 -0800), Vijay Subramanian wrote:
>
>> Also note that reordering is tracked on the sender side using the
>> per flow variable tp->reordering . This measures the amount of
>> reordering on the connection so that fast retransmit and other loss
>> recovery mechanisms are not entered prematurely. Doesn't this
>> behavior at the  sender already provide the behavior you seek?
>
> Sorry I don't seem to understand what you mean. Do you mind explaining how
> the sender can help to restore performance on reordering network?

tp->reordering is initialized via the sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_reordering 
which controls how anxious TCP will be to fast retransmit.

By increasing net.ipv4.tcp_reordering you make the sending TCP less 
"sensitive" to duplicate ACKs and so less sensitive to reordering 
detected by the receiver.  The receiver is generating as many 
(duplicate) ACKs as before, it is just that the sender is ignoring them 
a bit more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html