[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354126817.14302.451.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:20:17 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ling Ma <ling.ma.program@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: move inet_dport/inet_num in
sock_common
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 04:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> +#define INET_MATCH(__sk, __net, __cookie, __saddr, __daddr, __ports, __dif) \
> + ((inet_sk(__sk)->inet_portpair == (__ports)) && \
> + (inet_sk(__sk)->inet_addrpair == (__addrpair)) && \
> + (!(__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if || \
> + ((__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if == (__dif))) && \
> + net_eq(sock_net(__sk), (__net)))
> +#define INET_TW_MATCH(__sk, __net, __cookie, __saddr, __daddr, __ports, __dif)\
> + ((inet_twsk(__sk)->tw_portpair == (__ports)) && \
> + (inet_twsk(__sk)->tw_addrpair == (__addrpair)) && \
> + (!(__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if || \
> + ((__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if == (__dif))) && \
> + net_eq(sock_net(__sk), (__net)))
Last minute change in a param name __cookie / __addrpair
I reverted this change as the 32bit part is not using the 'cookie', so
keeping __the cookie name makes sense.
I'll fix this and add performance results in the changelog.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists