netdev - Re: TCP and reordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1354103355.21562.46.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:49:15 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, saku@...i.fi,
	rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP and reordering

On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 03:02 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Thanks. For me after a 64MiB download, I have an increase of one FACK,
> > one SACK and one TS reorder. So my connection probably does even less
> > reordering than I thought, and thus isn't particularly relevant to this
> > conversation. I'll shut up now and go back to playing with ATM.
> 
> But you are the receiver. A receiver should not increase these counters.

I checked it on the sending side.

-- 
dwmw2


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)