lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354105619.14302.89.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:26:59 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, saku@...i.fi,
	rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP and reordering

On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 11:49 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 03:02 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Thanks. For me after a 64MiB download, I have an increase of one FACK,
> > > one SACK and one TS reorder. So my connection probably does even less
> > > reordering than I thought, and thus isn't particularly relevant to this
> > > conversation. I'll shut up now and go back to playing with ATM.
> > 
> > But you are the receiver. A receiver should not increase these counters.
> 
> I checked it on the sending side.
> 

If you want to play with reordering effects on your bi-ADSL line,
you could install an "netem delay 3ms" on ingress side of one of the
link.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ