[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354300414.21562.306.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:33:34 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc: "Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nathan@...verse.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 18:00 +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:23:46PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > +static void br2684_release_cb(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc)
> > +{
> > + struct br2684_vcc *brvcc = BR2684_VCC(atmvcc);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * A race with br2684_xmit_vcc() might cause a spurious wakeup just
> > + * after that function *stops* the queue, and qspace might actually
> > + * go negative before the queue stops again. We cope with that.
> > + */
>
> We cannot race with br2684_xmit_vcc() because both br2684_xmit_vcc()
> and br2684_release_cb() are called with locked sk->sk_lock.slock.
Ah, right. For some reason I thought the lock was already dropped when
->release_cb() was called. In that case I'll remove the comment. Thanks.
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists