[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354837321.2828.86.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 23:42:01 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] fix vlan transmit performance
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:54 -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When doing some 10GbE perf measurments on very old athlon64
> machines with myri10ge, I noticed that I was seeing CPU saturation
> when transmitting vlan tagged traffic. I think I traced the
> problem to this line in netif_skb_features():
>
> features &= (skb->dev->vlan_features | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX);
>
> The problem seems to be that packets travel through this function
> twice, first on their way to the vlan xmit handler, and then on
> their way to the backing device's xmit handler. On the first
> pass, "skb->dev" is the vlan device, and skb->dev->vlan_features
> is blank. This causes netif_skb_features() to strip the offloads
> away.
On the first pass through dev_hard_start_xmit(), we should have:
if (protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) { // false
...
} else if (!vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) { // true
return harmonize_features(skb, protocol, features);
}
// not executed
features &= (skb->dev->vlan_features | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX);
...
Then the VLAN tag gets inserted in vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit(), and for
the second pass we used the vlan_features of the underlying device.
However, when reorder_hdr is off and the underlying device doesn't have
NETIF_F_VLAN_TX, the VLAN tag is inserted before the first pass, in
vlan_dev_hard_header(). Then, as you've seen, all TX offload features
get disabled. (Prior to Linux 2.6.37 this configuration was
*completely* broken as the TX path didn't make consistent decisions
about whether offload features could be used.)
My answer would be: leave reorder_hdr enabled per default. In fact,
perhaps the VLAN driver's TX path should ignore it if the underlying
device has non-zero vlan_features. (It's already ignored if the
underlying device has NETIF_F_VLAN_TX.)
> The following patch (just copy dev->features to dev->vlan_features in
> vlan_dev_init()) seems to be the simplest way to fix it. Perhaps this
> is wrong, and there is a better way?
[...]
It's wrong, because those features would then be recursively transferred
to further stacked VLAN devices.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists