[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212071149150.4985@morpheus.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:52:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: joseph.gasparakis@...el.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, gospo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry@...adcom.com,
saeed.bishara@...il.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded
encapsulation
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:41:46 -0800 (PST)
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)
> >>
> >> > So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming
> >> > if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol
> >> > driver.
> >> >
> >> > To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of
> >> > patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are
> >> > the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation.
> >> > As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used
> >> > also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could
> >> > indicate these features there from the driver.
> >> >
> >> > Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM
> >> > is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention
> >> > in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and
> >> > turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are
> >> > already HW checksummed.
> >> >
> >>
> >> This is the kind of language that belongs in the commit message and
> >> code comments.
> >>
> > Sure. I'll wait to gather some more feedback if there is any and I will
> > re-spin this off adding more code comments and clarify this in the logs.
>
> Great.
>
> Please note that this request applies to your receive side change too.
>
I believe the logs are sufficient in the rx patch:
This patch adds capability in vxlan to identify received
checksummed inner packets and signal them to the upper layers of
the stack. The driver needs to set the skb->encapsulation bit
and also set the skb->ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
...but I can add more comments to the code if this is what you are
referring to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists