[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3108632.YdjKGB5H1R@linux-lqwf.site>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:19:34 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve@...well.net>,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] smsc95xx: enable dynamic autosuspend (RFC)
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 20:53:19 Ming Lei wrote:
> In fact, I have test data which can show a much power save
> on OMAP3 based beagle board plus asix usbnet device with
> the periodic work. IMO, the power save after introducing periodic
> timer depends on the arch or platform, there should be much power
> save if the CPU power consumption is very less. So how about letting
> module parameter switch on/off the periodic work?
You could ask on linux-power and netdev. But there would be an
obvious question: Why kernel space?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists