lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:39:45 +0100
From:	Steffen Klassert <>
To:	RongQing Li <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: avoid to send/receive the exceeding hard
 lifetime data

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:58:03PM +0800, RongQing Li wrote:
> Yes, RFC does not say how to handle this packet.
> But when I do a IPsec compliance test with IxANVL, the test case 5.3/5.11,
> which reports a error because it expects this packet should be dropped, but not.
> I do not know if it is bug, or if it is valuable to fix it?

As long as the RFC does not state anything else, we ar ok in the
synchronous code path. But we need a fix for the asynchronous
code path.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists