lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJFZqHyRTW5eShGzLVzkHTDAeopwC5L6wS=Cfh_DTa82DE2s1g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:36:27 +0800 From: RongQing Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com> To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: avoid to send/receive the exceeding hard lifetime data 2012/12/14 Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:58:03PM +0800, RongQing Li wrote: >> >> Yes, RFC does not say how to handle this packet. >> >> But when I do a IPsec compliance test with IxANVL, the test case 5.3/5.11, >> which reports a error because it expects this packet should be dropped, but not. >> >> >> I do not know if it is bug, or if it is valuable to fix it? >> > > As long as the RFC does not state anything else, we ar ok in the > synchronous code path. But we need a fix for the asynchronous > code path. > Thanks. -Roy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists