netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: avoid to send/receive the exceeding hard lifetime data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJFZqHyRTW5eShGzLVzkHTDAeopwC5L6wS=Cfh_DTa82DE2s1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:36:27 +0800
From:	RongQing Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
To:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: avoid to send/receive the exceeding hard
 lifetime data

2012/12/14 Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:58:03PM +0800, RongQing Li wrote:
>>
>> Yes, RFC does not say how to handle this packet.
>>
>> But when I do a IPsec compliance test with IxANVL, the test case 5.3/5.11,
>> which reports a error because it expects this packet should be dropped, but not.
>>
>>
>> I do not know if it is bug, or if it is valuable to fix it?
>>
>
> As long as the RFC does not state anything else, we ar ok in the
> synchronous code path. But we need a fix for the asynchronous
> code path.
>

Thanks.

-Roy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html