lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:36:27 +0800
From:	RongQing Li <>
To:	Steffen Klassert <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: avoid to send/receive the exceeding hard
 lifetime data

2012/12/14 Steffen Klassert <>:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:58:03PM +0800, RongQing Li wrote:
>> Yes, RFC does not say how to handle this packet.
>> But when I do a IPsec compliance test with IxANVL, the test case 5.3/5.11,
>> which reports a error because it expects this packet should be dropped, but not.
>> I do not know if it is bug, or if it is valuable to fix it?
> As long as the RFC does not state anything else, we ar ok in the
> synchronous code path. But we need a fix for the asynchronous
> code path.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists