[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B70F0@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:59:01 -0000
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Nicolas Dichtel" <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] netlink: align attributes on 64-bits
> - if (unlikely(skb_tailroom(skb) < nla_total_size(attrlen)))
> + int align = IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)skb_tail_pointer(skb), sizeof(void *)) ? 0 : 4;
> +
> + if (unlikely(skb_tailroom(skb) < nla_total_size(attrlen) + align))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> + if (align) {
> + /* Goal is to add an attribute with size 4. We know that
> + * NLA_HDRLEN is 4, hence payload is 0.
> + */
> + __nla_reserve(skb, 0, 0);
> + }
> +
Shouldn't the size of the dummy parameter be based on the value
of 'align' - and that be based on the amount of padding needed?
That aligns the write pointer, what guarantees the alignment of
the start of the buffer - so that the reader will find aligned data?
What guarantees that the reader will read the data into an
8-byte aligned buffer.
There is also the lurking issue of items that require more
than 8-byte alignment.
(x86/amd64 requires 16-byte alignment for 16-byte SSE2 regs and
32-byte alignment for the AVX regs.)
Will anyone ever want to put such items into a netlink message?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists