lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219170912.GB6975@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:09:12 +0000
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc:	bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: align attributes on 64-bits

On 12/19/12 at 12:22pm, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Here padlen will return 4, which is wrong: padlen + NLA_HDRLEN = 8,
> alignment is the same than before. Here is a proposal fix:
> 
> diff --git a/lib/nlattr.c b/lib/nlattr.c
> index e4f0329..1556313 100644
> --- a/lib/nlattr.c
> +++ b/lib/nlattr.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,10 @@ struct nlattr *__nla_reserve(struct sk_buff
> *skb, int attrtype, int attrlen)
>  		struct nlattr *pad;
>  		size_t padlen;
> 
> -		padlen = nla_total_size(offset) - offset -  NLA_HDRLEN;
> +		/* We need to remove NLA_HDRLEN two times: one time for the
> +		 * attribute hdr and one time for the pad attribute hdr.
> +		 */
> +		padlen = nla_total_size(offset) - offset -  2 * NLA_HDRLEN;
>  		pad = (struct nlattr *) skb_put(skb, nla_attr_size(padlen));
>  		pad->nla_type = 0;
>  		pad->nla_len = nla_attr_size(padlen);
> 
> With this patch, it seems goods. attribute are always aligned on 8 bytes. Also
> I did not notice any problem with size calculation (I try some ip
> link, ip xfrm, ip [m]route).
> 
> Do you want to make more tests? Or will your repost the full patch?
> I can do it if you don't have time.

Thanks.

I would like to do some testing as well. I do expect some fallout from
this. There is likely some interface abuse that will now be exposed
due to this.

We'll have to wait for the next merge window to open anyway. I'd
consider this a new feature and not a bugfix based on the possible
regression impact it could have.

I'll post a new version of the patch integrating your fix above so
others (especially subsystem maintainers depending on netlink) can run
the patch as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ