[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219172012.GC6975@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:20:12 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: align attributes on 64-bits
On 12/19/12 at 09:17am, David Laight wrote:
> You can't use memcpy() to copy a pointer to a misaligned
> structure into an aligned buffer. The compiler assumes
> the pointer is aligned and will use instructions that
> depend on the alignment.
I am not sure I understand this correctly. Are you saying
that the following does not work on i386?
struct foo {
uint32_t a;
uint64_t b;
};
struct foo buf;
memcpy(&buf, nla_data(attr), nla_len(attr));
printf([...], buf.b);
> I think:
> 1) Alignment is only needed on systems that have 'strict alignment'
> requirements (maybe disable for testing?)
Right, what about mixed 32bit/64bit environments?
> 2) Alignment is only needed for parameters whose size is a
> multiple of the alignment (a structure containing a
> field that needs 8 byte alignment will always be a multiple
> of 8 bytes long).
Good point. I'll fix this in the next iteration of the patch.
> 3) You need to add NA_HDR_LEN to the write pointer before
> determining the size of the pad.
Right, I'm doing this in the patch I proposed. Or are you referring
to something else?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists