netdev - Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:50:32 -0500
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Yury Stankevich <urykhy@...il.com>
CC:	Hasan Chowdhury <shemonc@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface

On 12-12-21 08:13 AM, Yury Stankevich wrote:

> sure,
> i use it ingress,
> so, i need to use tc xt action
> to get mark on the packet, before filter on ifb will run.

Ok. So does ifb see it?

> prerouting rule, in turn, used to test if mark was actually restored.

No experience with connmark, but - in order to restore something has
to store it, correct?

> in practice:
> 1. prerouting rule - is not fired. so, no packets with mark was seen.
> 2. filter on ifb - do not pass traffic to flow configured.
> looks like `CONNMARK --restore` is not really called.
>

My suspicion is that it is not set to begin with...

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html