lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50E0A963.6080900@hp.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:51:47 -0800 From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> To: Jamie Gloudon <jamie.gloudon@...il.com> CC: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is keepalive behaving as expected in 3.7.0+/net-next? > Make a lot of sense. However, I got the impression from Rick that > having tcp_keepalive_intvl > tcp_keepalive_time behaved correctly in > older versions of the kernel. I seek to make no assertions about the behaviour of older kernels. I was just going off the ip-sysctl.txt wording I was looking to clean-up. rick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists