netdev - Re: Is keepalive behaving as expected in 3.7.0+/net-next?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50e0ef55.11f2640a.4ef8.ffffd018@mx.google.com>
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:50:09 -0400
From:	Jamie Gloudon <jamie.gloudon@...il.com>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is keepalive behaving as expected in 3.7.0+/net-next?

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:51:47PM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> >Make a lot of sense. However, I got the impression from Rick that
> >having tcp_keepalive_intvl > tcp_keepalive_time behaved correctly in
> >older versions of the kernel.
> 
> I seek to make no assertions about the behaviour of older kernels.  I was
> just going off the ip-sysctl.txt wording I was looking to clean-up.
> 
> rick

Ok, should ip-sysctl.txt documentation be updated to warn not to set tcp_keepalive_intvl > tcp_keepalive_time?

Regards,
Jamie Gloudon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html