netdev - Re: [patch net-next 01/15] net: introduce upper device lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121230205633.5e5614ac@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:56:33 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com, faisal.latif@...el.com, fbl@...hat.com,
	roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
	fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net, divy@...lsio.com,
	jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com, sony.chacko@...gic.com,
	linux-driver@...gic.com, kaber@...sh.net, ursula.braun@...ibm.com,
	blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, joe@...ches.com,
	amwang@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
	john.r.fastabend@...el.com, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 01/15] net: introduce upper device lists

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:58:08 +0100
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:

> This lists are supposed to serve for storing pointers to all upper devices.
> Eventually it will replace dev->master pointer which is used for
> bonding, bridge, team but it cannot be used for vlan, macvlan where
> there might be multiple upper present. In case the upper link is
> replacement for dev->master, it is marked with "master" flag.
> 
> New upper device list resolves this limitation. Also, the information
> stored in lists is used for preventing looping setups like
> "bond->somethingelse->samebond"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>

What is the use case for this?
Could you describe a topology that the new upper device list supports,
that the old scheme does not?

I am concerned that it may open up many new possibilities for user
error that were not possible before. For example how does it prevent
an ethernet from being assigned to both a bonding and bridge at the
same time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html