[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357218807.21409.24399.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:13:27 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: split tcp_ecn sysctl knob to distinguish
between IPv4 and IPv6
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 13:57 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Currently not, but I will try. :)
>
> Is the direction to split the sysctl ok? Or should it be a unified sysctl for
> ipv4/ipv6 and only be separate per namespace?
>
I fixed some ECN glitches in IPv6 in the past, I am not sure we can
assume IPv6 gear is ECN bug free. In fact it might be the opposite.
So adding a per net sysctl would allow a better tuning for experiments,
and allow some applications to use a private netns and change their
sysctl.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists