[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130103082254.770d4222@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:22:54 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: split tcp_ecn sysctl knob to distinguish
between IPv4 and IPv6
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:58:12 +0100
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:53:50AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:28:44 +0100
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:00:09AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > >> ECN could be more reliable when used with IPv6 (I don't have proofs). For
> > >> people who want to try ECN with IPv6 but still have problems connecting
> > >> to destinations because of broken IPv4 routers this switch allows one
> > >> to enable ECN just for IPv6.
> > >>
> > >> Perhaps ECN could be enabled by default in future.
> > >>
> > >> No code changes since initial submission, just added documentation.
> > >
> > > May I ask what lead to the rejection of the patch?
> >
> > I don't see any value in splitting up ipv4 and ipv6.
> >
> > I think we should turn the existing knob on unliaterally
> > by default. That would be a much better patch.
>
> Oh, I would be happy to do that. :)
Perhaps, ECN should be a property of the route.
There is RTAX_FEATURE_ECN but it appears to have been lost
as part of the removal of route cache.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists