[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0355baea-4761-477b-a68a-cd40fd5033b8@tahiti.vyatta.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:10:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pavlix@...lix.net
Subject: Re: [RFC patch net-next] ipv4: use bcast as dst address in case IFF_NOARP is set
> Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:11:55PM CET, stephen.hemminger@...tta.com
> wrote:
> >
> >> When IFF_NOARP is set on a device, dev->dev_addr is used as *dst*
> >> addr of sent frames. That does not make sense. Use rather bcast
> >> address
> >> instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> >
> >What did you test this on? I think this may have been
> >intentional to avoid broadcasting.
>
> Thanks for looking at this Stephen.
>
> I tested this on two boxes connected via ethernet.
>
> I believe this may have been intentional, but what sense does it have
> to
> use dev_addr as destination address? That is what I do not
> understand.
>
> Also, what is the issue with sending all packets to broadcast when
> NOARP is
> set? In my opinion, it only makes sense.
>
It looks like NOARP devices are point-to-point and don't really
have any concept of broadcast.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists