[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1301082245570.18402@nerf07.vanv.qr>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 22:51:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pavlix@...lix.net
Subject: Re: [RFC patch net-next] ipv4: use bcast as dst address in case
IFF_NOARP is set
On Tuesday 2013-01-08 20:10, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>
>>Also, what is the issue with sending all packets to broadcast when
>>NOARP is set? In my opinion, it only makes sense.
>
>It looks like NOARP devices are point-to-point and don't really have
>any concept of broadcast.
PTP links usually are NOARP, but NOARP does not necessarily imply
a PTP link.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists