[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357751075-23112-1-git-send-email-ariele@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:04:35 +0200
From: "Ariel Elior" <ariele@...adcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ariel Elior" <ariele@...adcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: align define usage to satisfy static
checkers
Static checkers complained that the E1H_FUNC_MAX define is used
incorrectly in bnx2x_pretend_func(). The complaint was justified,
although its not a real bug, as the first part of the conditional
protects us in this case (a real bug would happen if a VF tried to
use the pretend func, but there are no VFs in E1H chips).
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <ariele@...adcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
index 5fcaee1..8740b52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
@@ -13361,7 +13361,7 @@ int bnx2x_pretend_func(struct bnx2x *bp, u16 pretend_func_val)
{
u32 pretend_reg;
- if (CHIP_IS_E1H(bp) && pretend_func_val > E1H_FUNC_MAX)
+ if (CHIP_IS_E1H(bp) && pretend_func_val >= E1H_FUNC_MAX)
return -1;
/* get my own pretend register */
--
1.7.9.GIT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists